Engineering Principles

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QandClassmatesSSS.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Q is an Aerospace Engineering student working with a small team on a university project. Their brief is to design an innovative system to improve how renewable energy sites (like wind farms or solar fields) are inspected and maintained. Use the entrepreneurship principles to help Q navigate these choices. It’s the first team meeting and they are trying to decide how to start. ''What should Q suggest?'' * "[[Drones ->S2B]] are the obvious inspection tool, so we could start there. We just need to think about what would be different for these drones compared to existing drones.” * “We should start by [[trying to find out where inspections are hardest->S2G]], who performs them, and what challenges they face with current methods.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It could be that drones become part of the solution, but by jumping to solutions, you risk missing important details and may try to make your chosen solution fit the challenges rather than considering the challenges first and building a solution around them. Another team member says “The Beginner’s Mindset encourages us to ask open questions, so we don’t miss other problems or contexts that might be impactful” and the team agrees to start there. --------------------------- Each team has been given a brief which includes some basic information about inspection challenges of renewable energy sites. The team conduct further research online. They find that: • Wind-turbine blades and solar panels are inspected visually, often by workers using harnesses or elevated platforms. • Manual inspections are time-consuming, risky, and weather-dependent. • Existing drones help, but they still require expert pilots and can struggle in strong winds or near tall towers. • Some faults, like micro-cracks or erosion, are hard to detect visually. They now need to decide how to move forward. ''What should Q say?'' • “I read about [[AI drones->S3B+1B]] that can repair blades autonomously using nanobots. That would be an innovative idea. Let’s focus on that”. • “We already understand basic drone design, sensors, and materials. Maybe we can [[use what we know->S3G+1B]], like airflow, vibration sensing, or image analysis, to explore new ways drones could operate safely in these conditions”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good start. By asking open ended questions like this, you are applying a Beginner’s Mindset. They will help you understand what needs to be improved before deciding on a solution. --- Each team has been given a brief which includes some basic information about inspection challenges of renewable energy sites. The team conduct further research online. They find that: • Wind-turbine blades and solar panels are inspected visually, often by workers using harnesses or elevated platforms. • Manual inspections are time-consuming, risky, and weather-dependent. • Existing drones help, but they still require expert pilots and can struggle in strong winds or near tall towers. • Some faults, like micro-cracks or erosion, are hard to detect visually. They now need to decide how to move forward. ''What should Q say?'' • “I read about [[AI drones->S3B+1G]] that can repair blades autonomously using nanobots. That would be an innovative idea. Let’s focus on that”. • “We already understand basic drone design, sensors, and materials. Maybe we can [[use what we know->S3G+1G]], like airflow, vibration sensing, or image analysis, to explore new ways drones could operate safely in these conditions”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Bird in the Hand'' principle. By starting with what you already know, you’re applying resources you have at hand. ------------------------------ The team discuss the knowledge they and resources already have that could be useful. They realise that among their resources is access to some classmates who are drone hobbyists and a couple of students and graduates they know who are on placement or in graduate jobs with companies who manage renewable energy sites. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know->S4G+2G]] who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites. They might be able to give us further detail that would help shape our solutions.” • “From the research we’ve conducted online, we already know the main problems, so [[we should start designing->S4B+2G]]. Reaching out to people now is going to slow us down. We can ask them for feedback once we’ve completed our design.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> That’s a creative idea, and demonstrates a willingness to apply new technology, but it might be challenging to build a student project around it. Another team member says “The ''Bird in the Hand'' is about starting with what we already know and can use right now. I think we should build from our existing knowledge about drone design, sensors, and materials.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------- The team discuss the knowledge they and resources already have that could be useful. They realise that among their resources is access to some classmates who are drone hobbyists and a couple of students and graduates they know who are on placement or in graduate jobs with companies who manage renewable energy sites. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know->S4G+1G+1B]] who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites. They might be able to give us further detail that would help shape our solutions.” • “From the research we’ve conducted online, we already know the main problems, so [[we should start designing->S4B+1G+1B]]. Reaching out to people now is going to slow us down. We can ask them for feedback once we’ve completed our design.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Bird in the Hand'' principle. By starting with what you already know, you’re applying resources you have at hand. ------------------------------ The team discuss the knowledge they and resources already have that could be useful. They realise that among their resources is access to some classmates who are drone hobbyists and a couple of students and graduates they know who are on placement or in graduate jobs with companies who manage renewable energy sites. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know->S4G+1G+1B]] who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites. They might be able to give us further detail that would help shape our solutions.” • “From the research we’ve conducted online, we already know the main problems, so [[we should start designing->S4B+1G+1B]]. Reaching out to people now is going to slow us down. We can ask them for feedback once we’ve completed our design.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> That’s a creative idea, and demonstrates a willingness to apply new technology, but it might be challenging to build a student project around it. Another team member says “The ''Bird in the Hand'' is about starting with what we already know and can use right now. I think we should build from our existing knowledge about drone design, sensors, and materials.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------- The team discuss the knowledge they and resources already have that could be useful. They realise that among their resources is access to some classmates who are drone hobbyists and a couple of students and graduates they know who are on placement or in graduate jobs with companies who manage renewable energy sites. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know->S4G+2B]] who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites. They might be able to give us further detail that would help shape our solutions.” • “From the research we’ve conducted online, we already know the main problems, so [[we should start designing->S4B+2B]]. Reaching out to people now is going to slow us down. We can ask them for feedback once we’ve completed our design.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Know Your User'' principle. This will keep user needs at the centre of design, which is vital for innovation. ----------- After speaking with their contacts, the team learns that: • Strong gusts often force inspections to stop mid-task. • Drone battery life limits how many turbines can be inspected per day. • Dust and glare reduce image quality. • Transporting drones to remote wind farms is cumbersome. This is useful information, but the team are unsure how to proceed. ''What should Q suggest as the next step?'' • “Let’s [[define the problem broadly ->S5G+3G]], e.g., Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” • “Let’s [[gather more data->S5B+3G]] until we’re sure what the biggest issue is.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s important to learn as much about the problem as you can, including talking to your target users, before you start designing, to make sure that you are designing what they really need. Another team member says “The ''Know Your User'' principle tells us that we need to empathise with end users and understand their needs and challenges. Let’s speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ----------- After speaking with their contacts, the team learns that: • Strong gusts often force inspections to stop mid-task. • Drone battery life limits how many turbines can be inspected per day. • Dust and glare reduce image quality. • Transporting drones to remote wind farms is cumbersome. This is useful information, but the team are unsure how to proceed. ''What should Q suggest as the next step?'' • “Let’s [[define the problem broadly ->S5G+2G+1B]], e.g., Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” • “Let’s [[gather more data->S5B+2G+1B]] until we’re sure what the biggest issue is.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s important to learn as much about the problem as you can, including talking to your target users, before you start designing, to make sure that you are designing what they really need. Another team member says “The ''Know Your User'' principle tells us that we need to empathise with end users and understand their needs and challenges. Let’s speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ----------- After speaking with their contacts, the team learns that: • Strong gusts often force inspections to stop mid-task. • Drone battery life limits how many turbines can be inspected per day. • Dust and glare reduce image quality. • Transporting drones to remote wind farms is cumbersome. This is useful information, but the team are unsure how to proceed. ''What should Q suggest as the next step?'' • “Let’s [[define the problem broadly ->S5G+3B]], e.g., Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” • “Let’s [[gather more data->S5B+3B]] until we’re sure what the biggest issue is.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Know Your User'' principle. This will keep user needs at the centre of design, which is vital for innovation. ----------- After speaking with their contacts, the team learns that: • Strong gusts often force inspections to stop mid-task. • Drone battery life limits how many turbines can be inspected per day. • Dust and glare reduce image quality. • Transporting drones to remote wind farms is cumbersome. This is useful information, but the team are unsure how to proceed. ''What should Q suggest as the next step?'' • “Let’s [[define the problem broadly ->S5G+2G+1B]], e.g., Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” • “Let’s [[gather more data->S5B+1G+2B]] until we’re sure what the biggest issue is.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Know Your User'' principle. This will keep user needs at the centre of design, which is vital for innovation. ----------- After speaking with their contacts, the team learns that: • Strong gusts often force inspections to stop mid-task. • Drone battery life limits how many turbines can be inspected per day. • Dust and glare reduce image quality. • Transporting drones to remote wind farms is cumbersome. This is useful information, but the team are unsure how to proceed. ''What should Q suggest as the next step?'' • “Let’s [[define the problem broadly ->S5G+1G+2B]], e.g., Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” • “Let’s [[gather more data->S5B+1G+2B]] until we’re sure what the biggest issue is.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s important to learn as much about the problem as you can, including talking to your target users, before you start designing, to make sure that you are designing what they really need. Another team member says “The ''Know Your User'' principle tells us that we need to empathise with end users and understand their needs and challenges. Let’s speak to the drone hobbyists and people we know who are working in companies who manage renewable energy sites.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ----------- After speaking with their contacts, the team learns that: • Strong gusts often force inspections to stop mid-task. • Drone battery life limits how many turbines can be inspected per day. • Dust and glare reduce image quality. • Transporting drones to remote wind farms is cumbersome. This is useful information, but the team are unsure how to proceed. ''What should Q suggest as the next step?'' • “Let’s [[define the problem broadly ->S5G+1G+2B]], e.g., Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” • “Let’s [[gather more data->S5B+1G+2B]] until we’re sure what the biggest issue is.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle. You won’t ever have perfect data, but by framing the problem clearly now, you can move forward and refine as you go.” -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+4G]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+4G]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> More data can always help, but waiting for certainty can mean not moving forward. Another team member says “The ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle reminds us that we will never have perfect data, but we can act now and shape things as we learn. Let’s define the problem as: Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+3G+1B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+3G+1B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle. You won’t ever have perfect data, but by framing the problem clearly now, you can move forward and refine as you go.” -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+3G+1B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+3G+1B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> More data can always help, but waiting for certainty can mean not moving forward. Another team member says “The ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle reminds us that we will never have perfect data, but we can act now and shape things as we learn. Let’s define the problem as: Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+1G+3B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+2G+2B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> More data can always help, but waiting for certainty can mean not moving forward. Another team member says “The ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle reminds us that we will never have perfect data, but we can act now and shape things as we learn. Let’s define the problem as: Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+2G+2B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+2G+2B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle. You won’t ever have perfect data, but by framing the problem clearly now, you can move forward and refine as you go.” -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+2G+2B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+2G+2B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle. You won’t ever have perfect data, but by framing the problem clearly now, you can move forward and refine as you go.” -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+1G+3B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+1G+3B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> More data can always help, but waiting for certainty can mean not moving forward. Another team member says “The ''Pilot in the Plane'' principle reminds us that we will never have perfect data, but we can act now and shape things as we learn. Let’s define the problem as: Inspections of renewable-energy sites are limited by safety risks, environmental conditions, and inefficient drone operation. We need to find a way to make them safer, faster, and more reliable.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. -------------------------- Now that the team have a defined problem to focus on, they decide to start imagining solutions. They realise that it would be good to get input from the people they spoke with previously, but are concerned about bothering them too much. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s [[not bother our contacts again yet->S6B+4B]]. They’ve already helped us enough. Let’s ideate ourselves and then get their feedback once we’ve got a final idea to show them.” • “Let’s have an ideation session within our team, and then, once we’ve chosen our top ideas, we could [[send a summary to the people with spoke with before->S6G+4B]]. We can thank them for their earlier insights and show them how we’ve used them. Maybe they’ll have suggestions on which ideas seem most realistic.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Crazy Quilt'' principle. While you do need to be mindful about taking up other people’s time for your project, if you build partnerships and keep people involved respectfully, they are often happy to continue to be involved in projects. ---------------------------- After running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+5G]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+5G]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s understandable not to want to bother people, but innovation typically benefits from shared insights. Another team member says “The ''Crazy Quilt'' principle reminds us that collaboration and reciprocity can reduce risk and increase value for everyone. Let’s share our top ideas with our contacts, framing it as a way to keep them informed about progress and offering them the opportunity to input if they want to.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ---------------------------- fter running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+4G+1B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+4G+1B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Crazy Quilt'' principle. While you do need to be mindful about taking up other people’s time for your project, if you build partnerships and keep people involved respectfully, they are often happy to continue to be involved in projects. ---------------------------- After running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+4G+1B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+4G+1B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s understandable not to want to bother people, but innovation typically benefits from shared insights. Another team member says “The ''Crazy Quilt'' principle reminds us that collaboration and reciprocity can reduce risk and increase value for everyone. Let’s share our top ideas with our contacts, framing it as a way to keep them informed about progress and offering them the opportunity to input if they want to.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ---------------------------- fter running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+3G+2B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+3G+2B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Crazy Quilt'' principle. While you do need to be mindful about taking up other people’s time for your project, if you build partnerships and keep people involved respectfully, they are often happy to continue to be involved in projects. ---------------------------- After running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+3G+2B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+3G+2B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s understandable not to want to bother people, but innovation typically benefits from shared insights. Another team member says “The ''Crazy Quilt'' principle reminds us that collaboration and reciprocity can reduce risk and increase value for everyone. Let’s share our top ideas with our contacts, framing it as a way to keep them informed about progress and offering them the opportunity to input if they want to.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ---------------------------- fter running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+2G+3B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+2G+3B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s understandable not to want to bother people, but innovation typically benefits from shared insights. Another team member says “The ''Crazy Quilt'' principle reminds us that collaboration and reciprocity can reduce risk and increase value for everyone. Let’s share our top ideas with our contacts, framing it as a way to keep them informed about progress and offering them the opportunity to input if they want to.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ---------------------------- fter running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+1G+4B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+1G+4B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s understandable not to want to bother people, but innovation typically benefits from shared insights. Another team member says “The ''Crazy Quilt'' principle reminds us that collaboration and reciprocity can reduce risk and increase value for everyone. Let’s share our top ideas with our contacts, framing it as a way to keep them informed about progress and offering them the opportunity to input if they want to.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. ---------------------------- fter running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+5B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+2G+3B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Crazy Quilt'' principle. While you do need to be mindful about taking up other people’s time for your project, if you build partnerships and keep people involved respectfully, they are often happy to continue to be involved in projects. ---------------------------- fter running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+1G+4B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+3G+2B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Affordable Loss'' principle. You’re testing an idea in a simple, low-cost way that let’s you learn quickly and make informed next steps. ------------------------------------------ The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+6G]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+6G]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> Ambition is valuable, but it’s important to make choices about what investment of time and other resources is going to give you the best outcome within your constraints. Another team member says “The ''Affordable Loss'' Principle encourages not to chase maximum returns, but to build and test ideas through small, repeated cycles of hypothesis-action-learning. Let’s test the stabilising-shroud idea first. We can simulate airflow in CAD to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. Modelling the modular drone would take much longer to design and test properly, and we might not learn much more from it within our timeframe” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------------- The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+5G+1B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+5G+1B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Affordable Loss'' principle. You’re testing an idea in a simple, low-cost way that let’s you learn quickly and make informed next steps. ------------------------------------------ The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+5G+1B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+5G+1B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> Ambition is valuable, but it’s important to make choices about what investment of time and other resources is going to give you the best outcome within your constraints. Another team member says “The ''Affordable Loss'' Principle encourages not to chase maximum returns, but to build and test ideas through small, repeated cycles of hypothesis-action-learning. Let’s test the stabilising-shroud idea first. We can simulate airflow in CAD to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. Modelling the modular drone would take much longer to design and test properly, and we might not learn much more from it within our timeframe” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------------- The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+4G+2B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+4G+2B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Affordable Loss'' principle. You’re testing an idea in a simple, low-cost way that let’s you learn quickly and make informed next steps. ------------------------------------------ The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+4G+2B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+4G+2B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> Ambition is valuable, but it’s important to make choices about what investment of time and other resources is going to give you the best outcome within your constraints. Another team member says “The ''Affordable Loss'' Principle encourages not to chase maximum returns, but to build and test ideas through small, repeated cycles of hypothesis-action-learning. Let’s test the stabilising-shroud idea first. We can simulate airflow in CAD to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. Modelling the modular drone would take much longer to design and test properly, and we might not learn much more from it within our timeframe” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------------- The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+3G+3B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+3G+3B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Affordable Loss'' principle. You’re testing an idea in a simple, low-cost way that let’s you learn quickly and make informed next steps. ------------------------------------------ The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+2G+4B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+2G+4B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Crazy Quilt'' principle. While you do need to be mindful about taking up other people’s time for your project, if you build partnerships and keep people involved respectfully, they are often happy to continue to be involved in projects. ---------------------------- After running their ideation session, the team shortlist three possible solutions: • A lightweight stabilising shroud to help drones cope better with crosswinds during inspections. • A compact docking station on turbine towers that allows mid-flight battery swaps. • A modular drone design that can be reconfigured easily for either solar-panel or turbine-blade inspections. They share a brief summary of these ideas with their contacts and get some quick feedback: • The stabilising shroud sounds practical and cost-effective. • The docking station could be valuable, but the infrastructure costs might be high. • The modular idea is clever but may be too complex for a student project. The team now want to test which idea seems most promising — but they have limited time, money, and technical resources. ''What should Q suggest?'' * “Let’s [[test the stabilising-shroud idea->S7G+2G+3B]] first. We can simulate airflow in CAD software to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. We can mention our other ideas in our project report and explain why we chose not to pursue them.” * The shroud is a sensible idea but doesn’t seem very innovative. Although the modular drone idea is complex, maybe we should be ambitious. I think we should [[go with the more interesting and innovative idea.->S7B+2G+3B]]”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Affordable Loss'' principle. You’re testing an idea in a simple, low-cost way that let’s you learn quickly and make informed next steps. ------------------------------------------ The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+3G+3B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+3G+3B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> Ambition is valuable, but it’s important to make choices about what investment of time and other resources is going to give you the best outcome within your constraints. Another team member says “The ''Affordable Loss'' Principle encourages not to chase maximum returns, but to build and test ideas through small, repeated cycles of hypothesis-action-learning. Let’s test the stabilising-shroud idea first. We can simulate airflow in CAD to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. Modelling the modular drone would take much longer to design and test properly, and we might not learn much more from it within our timeframe” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------------- The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+2G+4B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+2G+4B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> Ambition is valuable, but it’s important to make choices about what investment of time and other resources is going to give you the best outcome within your constraints. Another team member says “The ''Affordable Loss'' Principle encourages not to chase maximum returns, but to build and test ideas through small, repeated cycles of hypothesis-action-learning. Let’s test the stabilising-shroud idea first. We can simulate airflow in CAD to see how it performs in wind. It’s a low-cost way to learn quickly. Modelling the modular drone would take much longer to design and test properly, and we might not learn much more from it within our timeframe” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------------- The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+1G+5B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+1G+5B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good application of the ''Affordable Loss'' principle. You’re testing an idea in a simple, low-cost way that let’s you learn quickly and make informed next steps. ------------------------------------------ The team use CAD to test the airflow around their stabilising-shroud design. After running a few tests, they notice something interesting: The shroud significantly improves stability in crosswinds but it also slightly reduces lift, meaning the drone would use more energy to climb or stay aloft at higher altitudes. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “It was good that we tested this. We’ve found that it’s not suitable for what we need. We still have time to [[drop this idea and look at one of the others.->S8B+1G+5B]]” • “Maybe [[we could use this feature->S8G+1G+5B]]. If it’s more stable but not as high-flying, it could be ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels i.e. situations where precision matters more than altitude.”

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Lemonade'' principle. Instead of treating a problem as a dead-end, you reframed it as an opportunity for a niche solution. ------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+7G]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+7G]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s best not to discard ideas too quickly. Innovation can come from adapting to perceived setbacks or failures. Another team member says “The ''Lemonade'' principle reminds us that unexpected outcomes can lead to unique advantages. Let’s present this as a feature of our design that makes the drone ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels”. The Team agrees to go with this suggestion. ------------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+6G+1B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+6G+1B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Lemonade'' principle. Instead of treating a problem as a dead-end, you reframed it as an opportunity for a niche solution. ------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+6G+1B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+6G+1B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s best not to discard ideas too quickly. Innovation can come from adapting to perceived setbacks or failures. Another team member says “The ''Lemonade'' principle reminds us that unexpected outcomes can lead to unique advantages. Let’s present this as a feature of our design that makes the drone ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels”. The Team agrees to go with this suggestion. ------------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+5G+2B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+5G+2B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Lemonade'' principle. Instead of treating a problem as a dead-end, you reframed it as an opportunity for a niche solution. ------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+5G+2B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+5G+2B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s best not to discard ideas too quickly. Innovation can come from adapting to perceived setbacks or failures. Another team member says “The ''Lemonade'' principle reminds us that unexpected outcomes can lead to unique advantages. Let’s present this as a feature of our design that makes the drone ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels”. The Team agrees to go with this suggestion. ------------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+4G+3B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+4G+3B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Lemonade'' principle. Instead of treating a problem as a dead-end, you reframed it as an opportunity for a niche solution. ------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+4G+3B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+4G+3B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s best not to discard ideas too quickly. Innovation can come from adapting to perceived setbacks or failures. Another team member says “The ''Lemonade'' principle reminds us that unexpected outcomes can lead to unique advantages. Let’s present this as a feature of our design that makes the drone ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels”. The Team agrees to go with this suggestion. ------------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+3G+4B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+3G+4B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Lemonade'' principle. Instead of treating a problem as a dead-end, you reframed it as an opportunity for a niche solution. ------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+3G+4B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+3G+4B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s best not to discard ideas too quickly. Innovation can come from adapting to perceived setbacks or failures. Another team member says “The ''Lemonade'' principle reminds us that unexpected outcomes can lead to unique advantages. Let’s present this as a feature of our design that makes the drone ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels”. The Team agrees to go with this suggestion. ------------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+2G+5B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+2G+5B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good use of the ''Lemonade'' principle. Instead of treating a problem as a dead-end, you reframed it as an opportunity for a niche solution. ------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+2G+5B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+2G+5B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> It’s best not to discard ideas too quickly. Innovation can come from adapting to perceived setbacks or failures. Another team member says “The ''Lemonade'' principle reminds us that unexpected outcomes can lead to unique advantages. Let’s present this as a feature of our design that makes the drone ideal for close-up inspections of blades or panels”. The Team agrees to go with this suggestion. ------------------------------------- With renewed focus, the team refine their design to highlight its new strengths. They decide their concept will be a precision inspection drone specifically designed for close-range work on wind-turbine blades and solar-panel surfaces. They update their simulation visuals and draft a final presentation that includes: • A lightweight aerodynamic shroud that enhances stability in strong winds. • A focus on close-range inspection tasks, improving safety and image quality. • Evidence from CAD simulations showing measurable stability improvements. • Potential future developments, such as compatibility with modular attachments or docking systems. They have to deliver a presentation and as the deadline approaches, they discuss how to present their story. ''What should Q suggest?'' • “Let’s explain this [[as a story from our target users’ point of view->S9G+1G+6B]]. We can describe the challenges they face, the problems with the existing solutions, and how our solution can address those. Let’s summarise the process we followed, including the Double Diamond and our application of entrepreneurship principles and the information we gathered at each stage i.e. from online research, speaking to people, and testing.” • “Let’s [[focus on the idea itself->S9B+1G+6B]] and the technical details. We don’t need to explain how we reached the idea”.

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QThumbBBB.png" alt=""; width="35%"> Good demonstration of the ''Deliver'' phase of the ''Double Diamond''. Presenting it as a story from the user’s perspective demonstrates understanding, relevance, and impact, which are key features of an entrepreneurial mindset. By explaining both the process and the product, you’re demonstrating a full entrepreneurial approach, not just your engineering knowledge. --------------------------- They [[deliver the presentation->Perfect]].

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> Technical ability is important, but the team have been given this project and information about entrepreneurial thinking for a reason. Another team member says “I think it’s important for us to demonstrate what we have learned about entrepreneurial thinking and how we have applied it to justify the decisions we’ve made.” The team agree to go with this suggestion. --------------------------- They [[deliver the presentation->Good]].

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QandClassmatesHappyYYY2.png" alt=""; width="80%"> In the presentation the team reflect on what they’ve learned: • Starting with open-ended questions helped them understand the real problem. • Using what they already knew (''Bird in the Hand'') kept the project achievable. • Talking to users made their ideas relevant and realistic, leading to a compelling and credible solution. • Testing affordably saved time and allowed them to iterate quickly. • Reframing a setback turned into a defining feature of their solution. They conclude that innovation isn’t about having the perfect idea from the start, it’s about staying curious, collaborating thoughtfully, and adapting when things change. ''They receive feedback on their presentation and final report:'' “You’ve clearly understood the challenges faced by end-users and showed how your design could make inspections safer and more efficient. Your presentation told a strong story that connected user needs, technical design, and entrepreneurial thinking.” ---------------------------- Congratulations on helping the team achieve this result. You have an excellent understanding of how to apply entrepreneurial mindset principles. You helped Q to navigate through some difficult choices to reach a positive conclusion. ''Here is your completion code: MAE-EM-PRINCIPLES''

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/QandClassmatesHappyYYY.png" alt=""; width="80%"> In the presentation the team reflect on what they’ve learned: • Starting with open-ended questions helped them understand the real problem. • Using what they already knew (''Bird in the Hand'') kept the project achievable. • Talking to users made their ideas relevant and realistic, leading to a compelling and credible solution. • Testing affordably saved time and allowed them to iterate quickly. • Reframing a setback turned into a defining feature of their solution. They conclude that innovation isn’t about having the perfect idea from the start, it’s about staying curious, collaborating thoughtfully, and adapting when things change. ''They receive feedback on their presentation and final report:'' “You’ve clearly understood the challenges faced by end-users and showed how your design could make inspections safer and more efficient. Your presentation told a strong story that connected user needs, technical design, and entrepreneurial thinking.” ------------------------------- Congratulations on helping the team achieve this result. You have a good understanding of how to apply entrepreneurial mindset principles. You helped Q to navigate through some difficult choices to reach a positive conclusion. ''Here is your completion code: MAE-EM-PRINCIPLES''

<img src="https://cms25.neocities.org/Double%20Diamond%20Images/Qthinkingss.png" alt=""; width="30%"> In the presentation the team reflect on what they’ve learned: • Starting with open-ended questions helped them understand the real problem. • Using what they already knew (''Bird in the Hand'') kept the project achievable. • Talking to users made their ideas relevant and realistic, leading to a compelling and credible solution. • Testing affordably saved time and allowed them to iterate quickly. • Reframing a setback turned into a defining feature of their solution. They conclude that innovation isn’t about having the perfect idea from the start, it’s about staying curious, collaborating thoughtfully, and adapting when things change. ---------------------------- Unfortunately, you haven't chosen enough options related to the entrepreneurial principles to complete the game. [[Please try again->Start]]